AWS vs Sevalla
Compare detailed pricing, resource constraints, and overage fees to see how AWS scales against Sevalla.
AWS
db.t4g.micro plan
Sevalla
Database 3 plan
AWS vs Sevalla: which is cheaper for Managed Databases?
AWS RDS and Sevalla target different tiers of database management, with AWS RDS acting as a predictable standard for traditional applications while Sevalla provides a much broader, if more expensive, range of scaling options. AWS RDS pricing for database instances is relatively tight, running from $11.68/mo to $116.07/mo, with RAM allocations capped between 1 GB and 8 GB on standard 2 vCPU configurations. Sevalla spans a wider field, starting at $5.00/mo for minimal 0.25 GB instances and climbing to $3250.00/mo for massive 229 GB RAM machines backed by up to 58.5 vCPU cores. These Sevalla units often leverage high-performance NVMe storage, which contrasts with the standard EBS volumes typically found in the RDS ecosystem.
- Sevalla charges $0.30/GB for additional storage, which is significantly higher than the $0.12/GB rate applied to AWS RDS instances.
- Data egress costs are nearly identical, with AWS RDS charging $0.09/GB and Sevalla charging $0.10/GB for transfers beyond the base allowance.
- AWS RDS limits RAM to 8 GB on its standard entry-level tiers, whereas Sevalla permits scaling up to 229 GB for memory-intensive workloads that exceed standard RDS configurations.
- Sevalla includes modest storage buffers starting at 1 GB, while RDS users often find themselves provisioning larger blocks immediately to maintain IOPS performance.
AWS RDS is cheaper for the default baseline workload, costing $12.25/mo compared to the $65.00/mo required for the Sevalla Database 3 plan. Sevalla becomes the better fit when your database requires more than 8 GB of RAM, as the RDS tiering structure forces a hard ceiling on memory allocation that prevents further vertical scaling.
AWS vs Sevalla: monthly cost by workload size
Cheapest plan that fully covers each workload, calculated from the latest official pricing data (base price plus overage fees).
| Workload | AWS | Sevalla |
|---|---|---|
| Small1 GB RAM · 5 GB storage · 10 GB egress · 1 vCPU | $12.25/modb.t4g.micro | $65.00/moDatabase 3 |
| Medium4 GB RAM · 50 GB storage · 100 GB egress · 2 vCPU | $53.20/modb.t4g.medium | $800.00/moDatabase 6 |
| Large16 GB RAM · 250 GB storage · 500 GB egress · 4 vCPU | No self-serve plan covers this | No self-serve plan covers this |
Still exploring your options?
Don't limit yourself to just two provider. Compare individual services or design a complete multi-cloud architecture side-by-side.
Frequently asked questions
Is AWS more cost-effective than Sevalla?
The starting price for AWS is $11.68 per month, whereas Sevalla starts at $65.00. The true cost-effectiveness depends heavily on your specific resource requirements beyond these base tiers.
How do resource limits and scaling fees compare between AWS and Sevalla?
When scaling, overages dictate the final bill. For AWS, extra storage is billed at $0.12/GB and network egress is billed at $0.09/GB. In contrast, for Sevalla, expanding storage requires a plan upgrade and expanding egress requires a plan upgrade.
Should I choose AWS or Sevalla for my infrastructure?
For the default baseline workload, AWS is cheaper at $12.25/mo versus $65.00/mo for Sevalla, a difference of $52.75/mo. AWS's plan includes 1 GB RAM and 0 GB storage, while Sevalla's includes 4 GB RAM and 10 GB storage. Pick the more expensive option only if your workload needs its larger allocation.
Related cloud comparisons
Pricing metrics are updated automatically from official provider data. Last synced:
November 5, 2026