New Relic vs PagerDuty

Compare detailed pricing, resource constraints, and overage fees to see how New Relic scales against PagerDuty.

New Relic

📊 Baseline starting tier

Free plan

$0.00/ month estimated
Included in base planGuaranteed
Log volume100 GB
Monitored targetsUnlimited
Team seats1
Current workload overagesFinOps Audit
Base tier price$0.00
Log volume overage$0.00
Monitored targets$0.00
Team seats$0.00

PagerDuty

📊 Baseline starting tier

Free plan

$0.00/ month estimated
Included in base planGuaranteed
Log volumeUnlimited
Monitored targetsUnlimited
Team seats5
Current workload overagesFinOps Audit
Base tier price$0.00
Log volume overage$0.00
Monitored targets$0.00
Team seats$0.00

Comparing New Relic and PagerDuty for observability requires acknowledging that these tools serve different technical primary functions, despite both offering APM-adjacent features. New Relic operates on a model where basic observability is free up to a threshold, providing 100 GB of log ingestion and unlimited monitored targets. PagerDuty, while primarily an incident response platform, integrates monitoring features with a pricing spectrum reaching 48.00/mo. Both platforms allow for unlimited seats, which is a departure from older licensing models that penalized teams for adding more users to the dashboard.

  • New Relic enforces a hard limit of 100 GB of ingested logs, after which ingestion costs spike depending on your specific contract tier.
  • PagerDuty offers unlimited log volume, shifting the cost burden away from data ingestion volume and toward seat-based or feature-gated pricing models.
  • New Relic provides deep-dive APM metrics that analyze memory allocation and heap usage, whereas PagerDuty focuses on surfacing alerts generated by that data.
  • While PagerDuty does not charge for log volume, it lacks the raw instrumentation capability found in New Relic’s agents, which typically run on AMD EPYC or Intel Xeon instances in their backend.

New Relic is designed for teams that need to inspect raw trace data and granular memory performance to debug application bottlenecks. It functions as the primary repository for telemetry. PagerDuty is better suited for organizations that already have their observability data pipelines established elsewhere and need a centralized platform to manage the resulting alerts and on-call rotations. If your primary goal is to store massive amounts of log data without worrying about ingestion caps, the unlimited volume offered by PagerDuty prevents the common issue of unexpected overage charges that plague New Relic users who exceed their 100 GB quota. Most engineering teams eventually end up using both, as the alerting logic of PagerDuty rarely replaces the deep diagnostic instrumentation provided by a dedicated APM agent.

For alternative setups, you can also compare these rates with Datadog or Better Stack.

Still exploring your options?

Don't limit yourself to just two provider. Compare individual services or design a complete multi-cloud architecture side-by-side.

Frequently asked questions

Is New Relic more cost-effective than PagerDuty?

The starting price for New Relic is $0.00 per month, whereas PagerDuty starts at $0.00. The true cost-effectiveness depends heavily on your specific resource requirements beyond these base tiers.

How do resource limits and scaling fees compare between New Relic and PagerDuty?

For observability platforms, exceeding included quotas on New Relic or PagerDuty typically requires upgrading to a higher plan tier or negotiating custom limits for log ingestion and team seats.

Should I choose New Relic or PagerDuty for my infrastructure?

When evaluating the New Relic vs PagerDuty comparison, choose New Relic if your workload strictly aligns with their base limits and penalty structure. Choose PagerDuty if their starting footprint offers a more predictable financial trajectory for your specific application requirements.

Pricing metrics are updated automatically from official provider data. Last synced:
November 3, 2026