Sevalla vs Supabase

• Sevalla scales from $5.00/mo to $3250.00/mo, whereas Supabase spans a much wider range, topping out at $7460.00/mo for massive 256 GB RAM configurations.
• Storage overages are significantly more expensive on Sevalla at $0.30/GB compared to the $0.13/GB rate maintained by Supabase.
• Egress costs remain tight across both providers, with Sevalla charging $0.10/GB and Supabase slightly lower at $0.09/GB.
• The entry-level disk capacity on Sevalla reaches up to 100 GB, which dwarfs the 8 GB limit found on standard Supabase tiers, though Supabase provides a more robust path for scaling vCPU cores up to 128 vCPU.

Operational costs diverge based on the density of your dataset and the frequency of data retrieval. Sevalla allows for larger baseline storage allocations, which reduces the immediate sting of storage overages for medium-sized databases that stay under the 100 GB threshold. However, once you exceed those limits, the $0.30/GB overage tax becomes a liability for data-heavy applications. Supabase, while built on a more complex pricing model that includes MAU-based billing for authentication, offers a more predictable cost structure for storage scaling. If you are running high-concurrency Postgres workloads, the ability to tap into 128 vCPU instances on Supabase provides a performance ceiling that Sevalla’s 58.5 vCPU cap cannot match, even if the underlying hardware is comparable to standard cloud-hosted EPYC instances.

Supabase is cheaper for the default baseline workload at $25.00/mo compared to Sevalla at $65.00/mo. Sevalla becomes the better fit if your database requires more than 8 GB of included disk storage, as the cost of provisioning that capacity within the Supabase ecosystem through overage fees will quickly outpace the fixed monthly fee of a higher-tier Sevalla plan.